Probability-sum arbs
Within-venue categorical price-axiom violations discovered by Storm — venues whose multi-candidate books price the field at a sum materially above 1.00.
Storm scans every venue's multi-candidate categorical book each tick. By the probability axiom the YES prices across all candidates should sum to ≈ $1.00; when a venue's sum materially exceeds that, shorting every YES leg captures the excess upfront against a bounded payout (exactly one candidate's YES resolves at $1.00). Sorted by excess after fees. Research signal — Storm does not place orders or advise on trades.
-
25850 bpsSum of YES = $3.585 across 9 candidates2m ago
-
25770 bpsSum of YES = $3.577 across 10 candidates22m ago
-
23800 bpsSum of YES = $3.380 across 12 candidates22m ago
-
21465 bpsSum of YES = $3.147 across 44 candidates17m ago
-
17365 bpsSum of YES = $2.736 across 39 candidates17m ago
-
15750 bpsSum of YES = $2.575 across 21 candidates27m ago
-
14400 bpsSum of YES = $2.440 across 5 candidates32m ago
-
13605 bpsSum of YES = $2.361 across 46 candidates17m ago
-
12855 bpsSum of YES = $2.285 across 32 candidates17m ago
-
10205 bpsSum of YES = $2.021 across 32 candidates17m ago
-
9900 bpsSum of YES = $1.990 across 5 candidates17m ago
-
8450 bpsSum of YES = $1.845 across 5 candidates20h ago
-
7600 bpsSum of YES = $1.760 across 5 candidates17m ago
-
6400 bpsSum of YES = $1.640 across 13 candidates17m ago
-
3150 bpsSum of YES = $1.315 across 9 candidates7m ago
-
2350 bpsSum of YES = $1.235 across 11 candidates32m ago
-
2300 bpsSum of YES = $1.230 across 10 candidates32m ago
-
1950 bpsSum of YES = $1.195 across 4 candidates32m ago
-
1850 bpsSum of YES = $1.185 across 20 candidates32m ago
-
1800 bpsSum of YES = $1.180 across 8 candidates27m ago
-
1355 bpsSum of YES = $1.135 across 7 candidates22m ago
-
1200 bpsSum of YES = $1.120 across 5 candidates22m ago
-
1050 bpsSum of YES = $1.105 across 4 candidates22m ago
23 rows shown.